Competition as a sign of a vibrant market: why investors should pay attention

When people first look at a market that’s “crowded,” the knee-jerk reaction is often fear. “Too much competition.” “Too many players.” “The space is saturated.”

Competition as a sign of a vibrant market: why investors should pay attention

I hear this all the time from prospective franchise investors and entrepreneurs. And my response is almost always the same: competition is not a red flag, it’s a signal.

It’s a signal that customers care. That money is flowing. That people are voting with their wallets, and there’s enough demand to support multiple operators. If you’re evaluating a franchise, the presence of strong competitors isn’t a reason to run away—it’s a reason to lean in and ask sharper questions.

Let’s break this down to help understand: why competition means demand exists. If you stumble onto a category with no competitors, you need to ask yourself why.

  • Is this truly a “white space” opportunity?
  • Or is it an empty field because nobody wants what’s being sold?

More often than not, the absence of competition doesn’t mean you’ve discovered gold, it means you’ve wandered into a desert. Demand is unproven. Validation doesn’t exist. And you’ll be left carrying the weight of educating an entire market from scratch.

Competition, on the other hand, validates the category. It proves customers are already spending money on this problem or desire. Whether it’s shawarma, fitness studios, coffee, or dog grooming, the mere fact that competitors exist tells you one thing: people are buying. If people are buying, there’s a market worth studying.

Let’s look at competition as a proof of concept. One of the most expensive and time-consuming aspects of starting any business is proving the model works. Venture capitalists pour millions into startups that are little more than experiments in customer behavior. Most of those experiments fail.

In franchising, you don’t want to fund the experiment. You want to step into a concept that’s already been validated. Competition is your external proof of concept. It tells you the market is established enough to sustain operators.

Think about pizza chains. If you looked at the space fresh today, you’d see a dozen major brands and thousands of independents. On the surface, you might think, “Too crowded, no room for me.” But history shows us that while competition is fierce, demand is massive. Domino’s, Pizza Pizza, Pizza Hut and Papa John’s, to name a few, each carved its niche, each grew into billions. And new regional players still succeed every year. If you only chase “white space,” you might miss the next Domino’s hiding in plain sight.

Here’s the other thing investors sometimes miss: competition is good for operators. Why? Because it forces you and the franchisor to be sharper. To innovate. To create real points of difference that customers notice and care about.

If you open a restaurant and you’re the only one in town, you can get away with mediocrity. Customers will come because you’re the only option. But once competition shows up, your food, service, and branding had better deliver.

Franchise brands that grow in competitive markets are, by definition, more battle-tested. They’ve had to refine their unit economics, marketing strategies, and customer experience in an environment where others were already fighting for attention. That makes them stronger. So if you’re considering investing, ask yourself: is this brand thriving where competition is heavy? If yes, that’s a very good sign.

Now, here’s the nuance. Competition is healthy, but only if your chosen franchise knows how to differentiate.

Look closely at what sets them apart:

  • Do they own a niche (like fast-casual Middle Eastern with modern branding)?
  • Do they deliver superior unit economics (better margins, lower build-out costs)?
  • Do they win on customer experience (tech integration, loyalty programs, speed)?

If all they’re doing is copying competitors and hoping to undercut on price, that’s a race to the bottom. You want a brand that knows its unfair advantage, not one that’s scrambling to survive.

As an investor, your due diligence should be less about “Are there competitors?” and more about “Why will this brand win against them?”

Competition also signals vibrancy. A market with multiple players tends to attract more media coverage, more customer education, and more investment. JFK said “a rising tide raises all ships” and that statement is absolutely true here. Take specialty coffee. Starbucks didn’t kill local cafés—it created the category. Once the market understood the value of $5 coffee, independents and smaller chains thrived alongside. Today, there’s room for everything from Tim Hortons to Blue Bottle to neighborhood espresso bars.

As a franchisee, plugging into a vibrant market means you benefit from collective awareness. Customers already “get it.” You’re not convincing them why your product should exist, you’re convincing them why you’re the best choice. That’s a far easier hill to climb.

The word “saturation” gets thrown around a lot. But let’s be honest, markets rarely reach true saturation. Look at burgers. By any logic, that category should have been saturated decades ago. Yet new entrants like Five Guys, Smashburger, Shake Shack, and countless regional players have each built billion-dollar businesses in a supposedly “full” space.

The same is true in fitness, coffee, pizza, and countless others. Customers are always looking for something new, better, or more aligned with their values. The presence of competitors doesn’t mean the door is closed—it means the door is proven. What matters is execution, differentiation, and choosing the right location.

So how should you, as a prospective franchisee or investor, interpret competition?

  1. Market validation: if competitors are thriving, it’s proof of demand.
  2. Strength test: a brand that grows in a competitive market is likely stronger.
  3. Differentiation check: your due diligence is to confirm the franchisor knows how to win against rivals.
  4. Growth potential: vibrant markets expand—new entrants can still succeed if they execute well.
  5. Location strategy: even in competitive markets, smart site selection (using data, predictive analytics, and boots-on-the-ground knowledge) separates winners from losers.

The presence of competitors is not a warning sign. It’s an invitation. It’s a signal that customers are hungry, the category is alive, and the market has room for players who execute with excellence. The real danger isn’t competition, it’s complacency—both at the franchisor level and the franchisee level. If you choose the right brand, differentiate well, and operate with discipline, competition isn’t something to fear. It’s something to embrace.

When you see a crowded space, don’t turn away. Ask yourself: if this market is already vibrant, how do I carve my slice of it? That’s how fortunes are built in franchising—not by hiding from competition, but by thriving within it.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Shawn Saraga
Shawn Saraga
RELATED ARTICLES







EF100 People's Choice Award